Posted By Dokhi Fassihian Share

Over the past year, the Obama Administration has missed successive opportunities to bring real international pressure on the Iranian government to address the severe human rights crisis gripping the country. Instead, it has focused its political muscle on the singular objective of convincing Iran's leadership to stop nuclear enrichment. The result has been an almost cruel disregard for the plight of the Iranian people and their urgent need for international attention to their human rights situation.

Since joining the UN Human Rights Council in June 2009, the United States has worked to address crises in places as diverse as Haiti, Honduras, Burma, Sudan, Guinea, Kyrgysztan, Somalia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Yet, since the Green uprising started last summer, not a single resolution has been presented by the United States or European states on the brutal repression taking place in Iran.

By November 2009, five thousand Iranians were in prison, hundreds tortured and raped, and dozens put on show trials and sentenced to death or long prison terms solely for their peaceful demands for free and fair elections. Iran's leading human rights defenders, including Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi, and over a hundred human rights organizations from each corner of the world, called urgently for the UN to increase its attention on the human rights situation in Iran.

These fervent pleas went unheeded as the United States focused solely on securing nuclear concessions through its new engagement policy with Tehran. The idea of including human rights as an additional issue on the P5+1 agenda was also rejected for fear of compromising the negotiations. The lack of a strong international response served as a green light to Iran's leaders that there would be no serious consequences for more brutality against its population.

The Iranian people made two more attempts to show the world that they were ready to fight for their rights -- in December during the Ashoura protests and in February during the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution. They were met with deafening silence abroad and more repression at home. More calls for a UN special session were disregarded despite more deaths, detentions and executions of political prisoners. This time, Iran's imprisoned youth were told they should wait for the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review, a new UN mechanism designed to examine the records of all states on a four-year cycle, but not equipped to deal with human rights emergencies.  

At its review in February, the head of Iran's delegation, Mohammad Larijani, told the Human Rights Council that universal human rights standards such as equality under the law were Western concepts not in line with Iranian values and inconsistent with international law. He also stated that torture did not exist in Iran despite the fact that torture victims were sitting in the UN hall.

Unsurprisingly, Iran rejected 45 critical recommendations based on international law, including: to end discrimination against women; to end juvenile executions; to investigate torture in prison, including rape; to amend its penal code to remove vague "national security" crimes against dissidents; and to ensure the independence of its judiciary. At the same time, Iran lobbied governments to win a seat on the Human Rights Council to promote and protect human rights. In March, another session of the Council came and went with little to show for it. While the United States deserves credit for forcing Iran's withdrawal from the Human Rights Council elections in April, this tactical victory against abusive governments did nothing to afford protection for the Iranian people.  

In June, another effort to secure a UN mandate on Iran to investigate abuses was rebuffed. This time, the United States worked with the government of Norway to deliver a statement on the anniversary of the elections crackdown. Withstanding intense pressure from the human rights community, the Obama administration decided not to pursue stronger international action that would jeopardize its campaign to build support for another round of UN sanctions. Yet most observers, including Iran's embattled opposition, believe the policy of broad sanctions to punish Iran solely for its nuclear program -- without any mention of abuses against its citizens -- is, in fact, helping the Ahmadinejad government win support at home, not hurting it.

We know the pattern. Strong, consistent international pressure on the Iranian government to improve its record on human rights works. From 1984 to 2002, the UN Commission on Human Rights mandated a special representative on human rights for Iran. Toward the end of that period, the country saw modest and gradual improvement, particularly under the reformist presidency of Mohammad Khatami. Ever since that mandate was discontinued by a slim margin in 2002, conditions have dramatically deteriorated.

Today, over five hundred political prisoners languish in Iranian prisons, including three American hikers held unjustly for over a year. Iran executes more people per capita than any country in the world -- a number which has increased four-fold under Ahmadinejad. Iran leads the world in jailing journalists, and leads Saudi Arabia by a wide margin as one of two countries left in the world that still executes juvenile offenders. Persecution of religious minorities and women's rights activists have worsened so significantly that punishments include virtual life imprisonment and possible death sentences, and inhumane punishments such as stoning, flogging, and amputation continue to be sanctioned by the state.

What is lacking today is the moral resolve to elevate the rights of Iranian citizens as a matter of international priority. But this is not just a moral issue; it is a legal issue. Iran has legal obligations to uphold the rights of its citizens, and states have an international obligation to address their conditions appropriately. The Obama administration's single-minded focus on the nuclear issue has come at a very high cost for Iranians who risked their lives to attain their democratic rights. Iran's theocracy, seemingly the only beneficiary, has gotten a free ticket to punish them viciously.

On June 20, 2009, the day Neda Agha Soltan was gunned down on a Tehran street, President Obama quoted Martin Luther King when he said "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." The first step to attaining justice is to build recognition of injustice. The Iranian people need the UN's help -- as did the citizens of Chile, South Africa, and Hungary -- to attain justice. At the UN General Assembly meeting this fall, the United States has another opportunity to help them by ensuring the establishment of a UN mandate that will investigate abuses and encourage accountability for those perpetrating crimes in Iran. We should not miss it again.

Dokhi Fassihian is the executive director of the Democracy Coalition Project.

AFP/Getty images

 

MAZIAR

3:24 AM ET

September 4, 2010

very good piece

much better than the uninformed drivel of hooman majd

 

ZORRO

5:55 AM ET

September 4, 2010

To Point Out the Obvious

A government can not rule without the tacit support of the people.
Isn't it a greater problem that the Iranian people support their government (that commits the human rights abuses) than the absence of external watch dogs?

 

LOGICAL123

1:09 PM ET

September 4, 2010

Human rights monitors for Saudi Arabia, Israel and the US

While we are at it, why don' t we appoint human rights monitors for Saudi Arabia, Israel and the US too. Saudi Arabia just executed by public beheading two thieves. Israel is holding over 6,000 Palestinian prisoners, some of whom are refused medical treatment. The US itself is holding 2.3 million people in prison, where annually about 300,000 rapes are committed. We won't even talk about Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and extraordinary renditions.

Iran does indeed have a repressive government and the Evin prison can be a horrible place. But, the notorious Kahrizak prison was closed as soon as the top leadership found out what was happening there and justice officials who were in charge were fired and tried in court. Also, three of the guards who were involved in the deaths of three or four prisoners have in fact have been sentenced to death.

As far as Neda Soltan's death is concerned, it certainly was tragic. But, to bring it up on every occasion is simply dishonest. Clearly, the Iranian Government would have no reason to plan the killing of a young woman in public. There is no concrete evidence that the police or Basij deliberately shot her. The best explanation is that it was a tragic accident. The Iranian government in fact claims that she was murders to create sympathy for the demonstrations. The truth will probably never be known.

 

AVNER STEIN

2:53 AM ET

September 7, 2010

LOL

Are you comparing Saudi Arabia's public beheading to Israeli holding 6,000 homicidal Palestinians?

Israeli prisons are no less sinister than any other nation. In fact, yesterday a Palestinian serving a life sentence received a PhD paid for by Israeli tax dollars.

http://www.indyposted.com/107798/palestinian-security-prisoner-receives-phd-in-israeli-prison/

The US holds over 100,000 illegal combatants and they don't get 3 meals a day, university education, digital television, or even internet - as some Palestinian prisoners do.

Israel is already subject to a wide-range of rights groups. AI and HRW spend more time on Israel than any other nation, except for the United States.

 

JAYDEE001

5:15 PM ET

September 21, 2010

To what end should Obama

To what end should Obama support a "human rights monitor" for Iran?

Obama has enough on his plate right here at home without trying to change the way Iran treats its women, children, prisoners, etc. There are any number of pressing problems that urgently need his attention, and he has very little political capital left to spend on issues that are beyond his immediate ability to resolve. What makes anyone believe that Iran would accept a human rights monitor?

Aside from that there really is a cultural difference between what many nations consider basic human rights and what the Iranian mullahs and their supporters do. Cultures take generations to change.

 

The Middle East Channel offers unique analysis and insights on this diverse and vital region of more than 400 million.

Read More

Enter your email address to get twice-weekly updates from the Mideast Channel:

Delivered by Constant Contact