The Mideast Channel
A Partnership of the NAF Middle East Task Force and the Project on Middle East Political Science Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

Posted By Lara Friedman Share

Earlier this week, Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren reportedly said that relations between Israel and the United States "are in the state of a tectonic rift in which continents are drifting apart." The implication being that there has been a shift in the U.S. approach to Israel, led by a president who, unlike his predecessors, is "not motivated by historical-ideological sentiments toward Israel but [instead] by cold interests and considerations."

With Netanyahu due in Washington next week for a visit whose ostensible purpose is to demonstrate that relations between the two governments are good, these comments have raised some eyebrows.

Oren subsequently denied saying there was a rift (he said he used the word "shift"), but that doesn't really matter. Because it sounds so much like something you'd expect an Israeli official to be saying at this time, when U.S.-Israeli relations are under the most severe strain since the early 1990s and the reign of George Bush the elder, that people are ready to believe it. It has what some analysts call the sound of "truthiness."

Which begs the question, is it true? The clear answer is: no.

There is no "tectonic rift" between the United States and Israel. There has been no shift in the U.S. approach toward Israel. To the extent that things have gotten rocky between these two allies, it is the result, not of changes in Washington, but of changes in Israel.

Oren, as Israel's envoy to Washington, should be engaging in soul-searching over what he and his colleagues can do to remedy the situation, not acting like a powerless and largely disinterested political observer.

What we have today is a deeply-rooted and very strong friendship that is under stress. It is under stress because friendship is not a one-sided concept: it requires two people, or two countries, to behave in ways that demonstrate the kind of consideration and respect that is the bedrock of friendship.

It is a truism that America is Israel's best friend and unshakeable ally. And the Obama administration has demonstrated this, over and over: with its defense of Israel in the face of the Goldstone Report; with unprecedented military/security support and cooperation; with its defense of Israel following the Gaza flotilla debacle; with its support for Israel entering the OECD; with its ever-tougher approach to Iran. And with its resolute commitment to something that, for years, successive U.S. administrations have strived to achieve: peace for Israel, which is the single most important thing for Israel's survival as a Jewish, democratic state.

Unfortunately, the Netanyahu government has failed to respond to the Obama administration's friendship in kind. To the contrary, almost since the day Netanyahu took office, there has been a seemingly non-stop stream of actions and policies that almost seem designed to provoke and embarrass the Obama administration.

Who can argue that Israeli game-playing over the settlement moratorium -- turning a potential catalyst for the peace process into a months-long humiliation for the Obama administration -- were the actions of a friend? Or that announcing expansion plans for the East Jerusalem settlement of Gilo at virtually the same time as the moratorium was announced was the action of an ally?

Or who can forget the announcement of plans to expand the East Jerusalem settlement of Ramat Shlomo, an announcement made during Vice President Biden's visit to Israel -- a visit that had been planned for the express purpose of showing solidarity with Israel? Or the announcement, during Prime Minister Netanyahu's subsequent visit to Washington, of the issuance of building permits for the construction of a settlement compound on the site of East Jerusalem's Shepherd Hotel?

Sadly, these are but a few examples -- there are many more.

Netanyahu has played this game before. As prime minister in the late 1990s, he repeatedly embarrassed the Clinton administration as he worked to evade Israeli obligations under the Olso peace process and built the East Jerusalem settlement of Har Homa, over strenuous U.S. objections.

Under Obama, U.S. policy toward Israel has not shifted. Today the United States continues to behave in all ways as a real ally and friend to Israel. And in response, it has seen this friendship taken for granted. Rather than friendship, we have settlement expansion. Rather than respect, we have new home demolitions in Jerusalem. Rather than recognition of U.S. concerns, we have Israeli officials who cultivate a public narrative that U.S.-Israeli relations are falling apart.

It should pain anyone who cares about Israel to see the direction this friendship is taking. It should worry anyone who cares about the U.S.-Israeli alliance to see Israel act so dismissively in the face of serious and reasonable U.S. concerns.

U.S. support for Israel is indeed unshakeable, but friendship goes both ways. Rather than wasting time lamenting the supposed shifts and rifts in the U.S.-Israeli relationship, the Netanyahu government should stop the provocations and the political machinations and start acting like a real friend and ally. It can do this by demonstrating a real commitment to the Obama administration's efforts to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Netanyahu's visit to the White House next week is a good place to start.

Lara Friedman is Director of Policy and Government Relations for Americans for Peace Now.

AFP/Getty images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

ZATHRAS

5:27 PM ET

July 1, 2010

American policy toward Israel

American policy toward Israel has actually changed, because the incumbent American administration is less inclined to accept and defend every Israeli action on every subject.

This is a much smaller change than the change in Israel's own policy, which is in the direction Lara Friedman suggests. For the most part, the Obama administration has returned to the supportive but not wholly compliant attitude of earlier American administrations toward the Jewish state. However, it has succeeded an administration staffed with many officials among whom it was a point of pride to be "more Israeli than the Israelis." The Cairo speech and the call for a settlement freeze last year could never have happened during the Bush administration. Netanyahu government officials have reacted to this with a mixture of arrogance and incomprehension that does them little credit.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

8:46 PM ET

July 1, 2010

The Obama administration's attitude has changed - not Israel's

In recent weeks, the Obama Administration has endorsed "healthy relations" between Iran and Syria, mildly rebuked Syrian President Bashar Assad for accusing the U.S. of "colonialism," and publicly apologized to Moammar Gadhafi for treating him with less than appropriate deference after the Libyan called for "a jihad" against Switzerland.

When it comes to Israel, however, the Administration has no trouble rising to a high pitch of public indignation. On a visit to Israel a few months ago, Vice President Joe Biden condemned an announcement by a mid-level Israeli official that the government had approved a planning stage—the fourth out of seven required—for the construction of 1,600 housing units in north Jerusalem. Assuming final approval, no ground will be broken on the project for at least three years.

But neither that nor repeated apologies from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prevented Secretary of State Hillary Clinton—at what White House sources ostentatiously said was the personal direction of President Obama—from calling the announcement "an insult to the United States." White House political chief David Axelrod got in his licks on NBC's Meet the Press yesterday, lambasting Israel for what he described as "an affront."

As for the West Bank settlements, it is increasingly difficult to argue that their existence is the key obstacle to a peace deal with the Palestinians. Israel withdrew all of its settlements from Gaza in 2005, only to see the Strip transform itself into a Hamas statelet and a base for continuous rocket fire against Israeli civilians.

Israeli anxieties about America's role as an honest broker in any diplomacy won't be assuaged by the Administration's neuralgia over this particular housing project, which falls within Jerusalem's municipal boundaries and can only be described as a "settlement" in the maximalist terms defined by the Palestinians. Any realistic peace deal will have to include a readjustment of the 1967 borders and an exchange of territory, a point formally recognized by the Bush Administration prior to Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. If the Obama Administration opts to transform itself, as the Europeans have, into another set of lawyers for the Palestinians, it will find Israeli concessions increasingly hard to come by.

That may be the preferred outcome for Israel's enemies, both in the Arab world and the West, since it allows them to paint Israel as the intransigent party standing in the way of "peace." Why an Administration that repeatedly avers its friendship with Israel would want that is another question.

Then again, this episode does fit Mr. Obama's foreign policy pattern to date: Our enemies get courted; our friends get the squeeze. It has happened to Poland, the Czech Republic, Honduras and Colombia. Now it's Israel's turn.

 

ENIGMA

8:17 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Yawn

I always find it amusing how those who consider themselves the biggest patriots always seem to take the side of foreign countries over our President. Ironic that.

 

BETZ55

9:57 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Israel's attitude has changed.

" Israel withdrew all of its settlements from Gaza in 2005, only to see the Strip transform itself into a Hamas statelet and a base for continuous rocket fire against Israeli civilians. '

And Hamas isn't going to go away. It was a democratically elected body. And Israel only has itself to blame, you are ignoring the fact that Israel helped Hamas rise in the 1980s to defeat the PLO and then when the PLO ceased being effective advocates for its people, it embraced it and sidelined Hamas.

Zionism is the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians from ‘Jewish’ land. You can’t accuse Hamas while ignoring all the right wingers, like Lieberman, in Israel who call for the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. You’re a hypocrite and not very good one at that.

Israel never left Gaza. It still occupies Gaza’s airspace and coastal waters and controls all entrances and exits.

Since Israel “withdrew” from Gaza in September 2005 ’til today, the estimates run between 7,000 and 9,000 heavy artillery shells have been shot and fired into Gaza. On the Palestinian side, the estimates are approximately 1,000 Kassam missiles, crude missiles, have been fired into Israel. So we have a ratio of between seven and nine to one.

Israel runs daily incursions into Gaza even though it withdrew.
Gaza is sealed off and surrounded by Israel.

How many Israelis have been killed by rockets ?
3 in 5 years.

Rocket attacks from Gaza have almost ceased. A small number of rockets have been fired, although splinter groups and not Hamas itself are believed to be behind the attacks.
The same cannot be said of the illegal settler terrorists.

You’re quite right they shouldn’t have to pelt them with inaccurate rockets.

Please donate your money today to enable Hamas to use the same tanks, F16s, Apache helicopters and accurate rifles you keep buying for the Israelis.

Israel is moving towards becoming a police state, with knocks on the door in the middle
of the night, gag orders on the press, arrests under the cover of night based on secret, trumped-up charges, injuring and killing protesters, and requiring that Palestinians in the West Bank hold an Israeli issued ID rather than a Palestinian Authority ID or face deportation which threatens thousands of Palestinians and which is really a pretext for ethnic cleansing.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

10:10 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Hmm so General McChrystal must not be a patriot

as he strongly disagreed with the President and Vice President. He was also a big supporter of Karzai whereas the the administration was not.

Hmmmm, faulty logic have we?

 

ENIGMA

10:28 AM ET

July 2, 2010

those are specific policy disagreements....

many neocons provide blanket support for everything Israel does and trash those who dare to suggest a more even-handed approach. There's nothing wrong with "supporting" Israel but it ain't the 51st state. Their interests aren't the same as ours.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

10:47 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Betz the DRAMA Queen

Betz, you just don't like facts do you?

"It was a democratically elected body. And Israel only has itself to blame, you are ignoring the fact that Israel helped Hamas rise in the 1980s to defeat the PLO."

First, the U.S. pushed Israel to have palestinian elections, just as it pushed lebanon into elections. the U.S. made a miscalculation as to who would win...Hamas and Hezbollah.

Israel never supported Hamas. When Israel first encountered Islamists in Gaza in the 1970s and '80s, they seemed focused on studying the Quran, not on confrontation with Israel. The Israeli government officially recognized a precursor to Hamas called Mujama Al-Islamiya, registering the group as a charity. It allowed Mujama members to set up an Islamic university and build mosques, clubs and schools. This group later became Hamas. But at the time of Israeli recognition, it was simply a grass roots Islamic organization, focused not on terrorism but on religious study. So please, get your history correct.

"Zionism is the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians from ‘Jewish’ land. " What a load of bullshit. Is that why nearly 1/4 of Israeli citizens are "palestinian" Muslim arabs? Every time there was a two state solution offered, Israel accepted, dating back to the Peel Commission in 1937.

This is unlike the PLO which stated "no peace with Israel, no negotiations with Israel, no recognition of Israel" in their Khartoum Declaration in 1967.

And speaking of Genocide, Hamas spiritual leader Younis al-Astal, described it as a "war crime to teach palestinian children about the holocaust, which he claims is a "lie."

Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the founder and spiritual head of Hamas, declared that Israel must "disappear from the map."

The body of the Hamas Covenant and Charter includes unequivocal statements of Hamas' irredentist commitment to the annihilation of Israel via jihad.

Again we have you discussing the "force ratio." "So we have a ratio of between seven and nine to one. Israel runs daily incursions into Gaza even though it withdrew.
Gaza is sealed off and surrounded by Israel."

First, how about you fight a war, where you allow the enemy to overpower you. That is what you seemingly want. That sounds logical.... Maybe the U.S. should do that in Afghanistan. I don't see you complaining about the American use of fighter planes, tanks, and APCs against the Taliban, despite the fact that the Taliban do not have any of those things. The idea that one side is "immoral" or "less-just" in its fight, because it has better equipment or more of it is utter nonsense.

Also, the Russians and Americans dropped more bombs and rockets on germany than Germany dropped and fired into Great Britain or on Russia. So, that means the Allies were not just in their fight? Yep, everyone has to fire equal amounts of the same ordinance to somehow be equal and just according to your logic.

And it is gaza that launches attacks into Israel. There is a continued attempt to kidnap more Israelis for ransom and exchange. Israeli soldiers repel these attacks.

And since you want a parity of forces, should the Israelis do suicide bombings too? Would that make you happy? Hamas does those as its tactic. Maybe the Israelis should blow up a few buses and restaurants? Instead of using tanks. Would you complain then? They can stop using helicopters and just bomb family celebrations and hotels and buses, as Hamas does. And since you think "a few rockets" is not such a big deal, how about you and your whole family endure it and then tell me what you think. Yeah, there is only a 1 in 90 chance you might get killed or lose a leg. Lets see you risk your daughter getting her leg blown off by these rockets.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

10:50 AM ET

July 2, 2010

I recall plenty of "neocons" opposed to

The Oslo accords and Dayton accords, which Israel ratified. I also found many opposed to the Gaza withdrawal. And besides, the "neocons" have become the new "boogeymen." They aren't even in power any more....get over it.

 

TRUTH NOT PARTISAN

4:11 PM ET

July 2, 2010

@ betz

also, where did you get that information on only 1,000 crude missiles into Israel? There were around 8,000 recorded rockets flown into Israel since they left Gaza. And how would you like wars to be fought? Also, you forget theres a border with Egypt. Its a border, why wouldnt Israel be allowed to gaurd it? we guard the one with Mexico and Canada. Israel should be allowed to patrol their own borders as well. Dont only blame the Israelis. Jews have been a scapegoat for far too long and unfortunatley its not going away anytime soon.

 

BUDAHH

10:53 AM ET

July 2, 2010

You have a right to see it like that but look at this

o" the extent that things have gotten rocky between these two allies, it is the result, not of changes in Washington, but of changes in Israel."
"Unfortunately, the Netanyahu government has failed to respond to the Obama administration's friendship in kind."

WHy is it the change in Israel what has changed in Israel you have not shown us you only said it.?????

The Obama administartion has made a mistake they are the ones to blame so far, for the stall of peace talks and for the emboldening of the xtreme elements Turkey, Terrorists.
Obama is the one who demanded the freeze of all settlements and the palestinians cannot ask for any less, so after direct talks for 18 years we have lousy proximity talks.

You said the obama administartion has demonstarted it's friendship to Israel in many ways, they have humiliated the prime minister publically, you know that if America does that it sends the wrong message to our enemies, the appology was not enough we had to publicly be humiliated by hillary clinton. It ssends the enemies things are not strong and we can try to shake things up, look at how Obama has acted with the
NPT he left Israel to hang, he could have killed off anything but he didn't and the resolution was against Israel yet there was no mentioning of Iran. Is that what a best ally does, he could have killed off any investigation of the floatilla in the U.N and calm things down he didn't the u.n demanded international investigation.
The reason Turkey acts so louzy is because Obama is showing weakness and softness, he shows it is woth it to be with the enemy you get soft treatment and allies get the stiff treatment.
Israel has freezed all settlement activity in the west bank under the white houses request, no government has ever done that, and especially for a right wing government, you talk about gilo as a settlement, well lady I got news for you, for all Israelis from the extreme left and middle and right it is not considered to be a settlement but a neighboorhood in our capital just because you think so doesn't make you right. Do we tell the white house what they can build in washington??? Unlike the west bank which are considered settlements.
Having said all that America is Israels best friend and allie and the people are with us, and Israel should not embarass america, even Obama admitted he made a mistake
The U.s relations are not shifting apart the administaration and Israel are shifting apart, the senate and congress and the poeple in the U.S are with Israel and obama has seen that so he started palying nicer.
America is the greatest country in the world and I wish it will stay like that forever and the relations will get stronger and better I think that it willl get better everyone has learned something fron the two new governments and you will see next week in the meeting things are going to be better

 

VILKSSWEDEN

1:43 PM ET

July 2, 2010

Clever sketch on the U.N.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW4FTAcwL0k&feature=player_embedded

 

VILKSSWEDEN

1:49 PM ET

July 2, 2010

Clever U.K. Sketch Show on Hamas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIDLoUbS8YU&NR=1

 

BUDAHH

5:52 PM ET

July 2, 2010

What the heck are u talking about? what was your in 9-11

It was a war, why is it legal for terrorists to shoot rockets at innocent civilians and it is illegal for Israel to react.
who said the invasion to lebanon was illegal? I call it self defense.
Do you think it is against international law to shoot rockets at civilians????
DO you denounce terror? I think it was the druse who killed the palestinians there.
IF he killed palestinian terorists than I think he deserves credit and that is not a laughing matter

 

JAGELLER

7:45 PM ET

July 3, 2010

Gilo is not a settlement...

It is a neighborhood. It is contiguous with the rest of West Jerusalem, even if Jordan ruled there for 19 years. Jews purchased most of the land legally in the decades before the Egyptians captured it in 1948. The fact that Israel took Gilo back in 1967 and repopulated the area in the 1970s does not make it a settlement.

It's sort of like Texas, only without the brief period of national independence.

 

QPZMGR

1:14 AM ET

July 12, 2010

how about you

First, how about you fight a war, where you allow the enemy to overpower you. That is what you seemingly want. That sounds logical.... Maybe the U.S. should do that in Afghanistan. I don't see you complaining about the American use of fighter planes, tanks, and APCs against the Taliban, despite the fact that the Taliban do not have any of those things. The idea that one side is "immoral" or "less-just" in its fight, because it has better equipment or more of it is utter nonsense.

Also, the Russians and Americans dropped more bombs and rockets on germany than Germany dropped and fired into Great Britain or on Russia. So, that means the Allies were not just in their fight? Yep, everyone has to fire equal amounts of the same ordinance to somehow be equal and just according to your logic.

And it is gaza that launches attacks into Israel. There is a continued attempt to kidnap more Israelis for ransom and exchange. Israeli soldiers repel these attacks.

And since you want a parity of forces, should the Israelis do suicide bombings too? Would that make you happy? Hamas does those as its tactic. Maybe the Israelis should blow up a few buses and restaurants? Instead of using tanks. Would you complain then? They can stop using helicopters and just bomb replica rolex family celebrations and hotels and buses, as Hamas does. And since you think "a few rockets" is not such a big deal, how about you and your whole family endure it and then tell me what you think. Yeah, there is only a 1 in 90 chance you might get killed or lose a leg. Lets see you risk your daughter getting her leg blown off by these rockets.

 

The Middle East Channel offers unique analysis and insights on this diverse and vital region of more than 400 million.

Read More

Enter your email address to get twice-weekly updates from the Mideast Channel:

Delivered by Constant Contact